<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to detect Windows Mobile 6.1 (Detecting AKUs)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christec.co.nz/blog/archives/337/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christec.co.nz/blog/archives/337</link>
	<description>Development for a mobile world - Making a quality platform one application at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:38:21 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fahad Pakistan</title>
		<link>http://www.christec.co.nz/blog/archives/337/comment-page-1#comment-37558</link>
		<dc:creator>Fahad Pakistan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christec.co.nz/blog/archives/337#comment-37558</guid>
		<description>Do you agree with me if I use build ID to differentiate WM6.0 and WM6.1 OS devices.

check this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Mobile#Windows_Mobile_6.1


This is what it says on the link above:
&quot;Aside from the visual and feature distinctions, the underlying CE versions can be used to differentiate WM6.0 from WM 6.1. The version of Windows CE in WM 6.0 is 5.2.*, with the final number being a 4 digit build ID (e.g. 5.2.1622 on HTC Wing). In WM 6.1, the CE version is 5.2.* with a 5 digit build number (e.g. 5.2.19216 on Palm Treo 800w).&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you agree with me if I use build ID to differentiate WM6.0 and WM6.1 OS devices.</p>
<p>check this link:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Mobile#Windows_Mobile_6.1" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Mobile#Windows_Mobile_6.1</a></p>
<p>This is what it says on the link above:<br />
&#8220;Aside from the visual and feature distinctions, the underlying CE versions can be used to differentiate WM6.0 from WM 6.1. The version of Windows CE in WM 6.0 is 5.2.*, with the final number being a 4 digit build ID (e.g. 5.2.1622 on HTC Wing). In WM 6.1, the CE version is 5.2.* with a 5 digit build number (e.g. 5.2.19216 on Palm Treo 800w).&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Fairbairn</title>
		<link>http://www.christec.co.nz/blog/archives/337/comment-page-1#comment-25302</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Fairbairn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christec.co.nz/blog/archives/337#comment-25302</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill,

Thanks for the feedback, it&#039;s greatly appreciated.

I recently moved my blog between servers and it seems some of the content had a few errors after the move.

I&#039;ve fixed the link, and you should now be able to download the code sample. This weekend I&#039;ll check this issue isn&#039;t present in other posts on this blog (as I plan to complete the migration).

Thanks,
Christopher Fairbairn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill,</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback, it&#8217;s greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>I recently moved my blog between servers and it seems some of the content had a few errors after the move.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve fixed the link, and you should now be able to download the code sample. This weekend I&#8217;ll check this issue isn&#8217;t present in other posts on this blog (as I plan to complete the migration).</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Christopher Fairbairn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Shadish</title>
		<link>http://www.christec.co.nz/blog/archives/337/comment-page-1#comment-25300</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Shadish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christec.co.nz/blog/archives/337#comment-25300</guid>
		<description>Just noting that the link for akudetection.zip
on http://www.christec.co.nz/blog/archives/337
appears to now be bad.

Thanks
~Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noting that the link for akudetection.zip<br />
on <a href="http://www.christec.co.nz/blog/archives/337" rel="nofollow">http://www.christec.co.nz/blog/archives/337</a><br />
appears to now be bad.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
~Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

